Two partners, two ways of working, one client list
Partners who built their books differently do not want the same board, and should not have to share one. What they do have to share is the client record, the archive and the numbers.
The question at this size is not whether the software can do it. It is whether you can see the firm as one thing without forcing everyone into one workflow.
What usually goes wrong
Every partner runs their book differently
A single mandated workflow is how adoption dies. Separate systems is how the archive splits in two.
Who owns what is genuinely unclear
Client ownership, WIP, realization by partner — the answers are in a spreadsheet somebody rebuilds each quarter.
Diligence questions land on you now
Bigger clients ask where their data lives, who can see it, and what happens if you are breached. "In TaxDome, I think" is not an answer.
The modules that matter most here
All 18 are on every seat. These are the ones multi-partner firms tend to live in.
Pipeline
Where every return is, without asking anyone.
Clients
Everything you know about a client, on one screen instead of five.
Time & Billing
From the timer to the deposit, without rekeying anything.
Compliance
Every filing you owe, on one board — so March is not a memory test.
Documents
Every client document, filed before you touch it.
Proposals
Quote the work, get it signed, and watch it become the work.
A pipeline per kind of work rather than one imposed on everyone, one client record underneath, and a security page you can send a client without writing it first.
Not quite your firm?
Ready to retire the stack?
One plan for the whole practice — $129 per seat, every Practice module included. Start your free trial today; migration support from your current tools comes standard.
14-day free trial · No credit card required · Cancel anytime